- 最後登錄
- 2024-4-12
- 在線時間
- 0 小時
- 註冊時間
- 2014-12-13
- 閱讀權限
- 20
- 精華
- 0
- UID
- 15117685
- 帖子
- 347
- 積分
- 39 點
- 潛水值
- 6560 米
| 成為伊莉的版主,你將獲得更高級和無限的權限。把你感興趣的版面一步步地發展和豐盛,那種滿足感等著你來嚐嚐喔。 All forms of punishment or penalties nowadays should serve as primary or secondary prevention, not retribution.
Just like you said, a killer's worth to a community may be far less than the victim's worth; using that same theory, executing the killer doesn't make seem like a "fair trade." If you're looking the judicial system like that, then you're someone who believes in vengeance and our judicial system should act based on retribution.
For the same case, executing the killer can be an effective method to serve as secondary prevention, which is to execute the killer so he/she cannot kill someone else later. I believe a lot of western countries choose not to have capital punishment because those countries came across studies demonstrating that capital punishment does not effectively prevent killing/murder.... |
|